Vid Pufendorfinstitutet leder Miranda Kajtazi en Avanced Study Group vid namn "Human Rights, Digital Inequalities, and Social Consequences of AI”. Projektet pågår från september 2023 till juni 2024.
(engelska)"This ASG focuses on digital innovations by exploring the linkages between digital innovation and emergent digital inequalities in relation to human rights. While the world remains deeply divided between poor and wealthy, we argue that digital inequalities impact human rights in all walks of life, although the consequences are more severe for the poor. The persistence of such inequalities creates new venues for investigating how human rights are realized in protecting the marginalized and the protections aimed at promoting equality in the age of advanced AI." - taget från Pufendorfinstitutets webbplats.
Miranda Kajtazi är också medforskare i ett forskningsprojekt med titeln "What does a 'good' digital welfare state look like?" för ESRC Digital Good Funding Network, Storbritannien. Detta projekt pågår från augusti 2023 till april 2024. Hon delade med sig av följande korta introduktion av projektet:
(engelska)"The right to access social security is enshrined in international human rights law. However as welfare systems are digitised, this right is under threat both from unaccountable algorithmic decision making and digitally excluded communities’ lack of access to services. Despite extensive scrutiny of these negative shifts there has been little examination of what a ‘good’ digitised welfare system might look like, even in Nordic countries where citizen-state relations are premised on a generous welfare state. ICT for Development (ICT4D) and human rights offer normative frameworks to assess how a technology might contribute to human flourishing - including Sen’s capability approach and the Sustainable Development Goals. This project brings together UK and Scandinavian experts on the digital welfare state from computing, ICT4D, information systems, and human rights, together with community groups in the UK to capture the values underlying existing provision, and propose new normative frameworks for ‘good’ digital welfare."
